
Split-screen comparison: Autoflowering vs Photoperiod cannabis
Table of Contents
Key Takeaways
- Photoperiod Cannabis Requires Light Schedule Control: Photoperiod cannabis plants flower in response to changing day length, requiring twelve hours of uninterrupted darkness per twenty-four hour period to initiate and maintain flowering. This light-dependent flowering allows growers to control vegetative duration indefinitely by maintaining 18/6 or 24/0 light schedules, enabling techniques like mother plants, cloning, and extended vegetative growth for maximum size. However, photoperiod cultivation requires strict light schedule management and light-proof grow spaces to prevent flowering disruption.
- Autoflowering Cannabis Flowers by Age: Autoflowering cannabis contains genetics from Cannabis ruderalis, a subspecies from Russia that evolved to flower based on age rather than light schedule. Autoflowers automatically begin flowering two to four weeks after germination regardless of light cycle, completing their entire life cycle in eight to twelve weeks from seed to harvest. This age-based flowering provides scheduling flexibility and allows continuous harvests without separate vegetative and flowering spaces, but eliminates the ability to extend vegetative growth or clone plants.
- Photoperiod Offers Maximum Yield Potential: Photoperiod cannabis produces significantly higher yields than autoflowers when given adequate vegetative time. Indoor photoperiod plants typically yield 400-600 grams per square meter, while outdoor plants can produce 500-2000 grams per plant. The ability to extend vegetative growth allows photoperiod plants to reach desired size before flowering, maximizing yield potential. Autoflowers, constrained by age-based flowering, typically yield 50-200 grams per plant regardless of growing conditions.
- Autoflowering Provides Speed and Simplicity: Autoflowers complete their life cycle in eight to twelve weeks from seed to harvest, allowing multiple harvests per year outdoors and rapid turnaround indoors. The lack of light schedule requirements simplifies cultivation, eliminates light leak concerns, and allows flexible scheduling. Autoflowers suit beginners, guerrilla growers, and situations requiring speed or stealth. However, the rapid life cycle leaves little time to recover from mistakes, and the inability to clone means purchasing seeds for each grow.
- Photoperiod Excels for Advanced Techniques: Photoperiod cannabis supports advanced cultivation techniques including cloning, mother plants, training methods, and stress recovery. Growers can maintain mother plants indefinitely in vegetative state, taking unlimited clones for consistent genetics. Training techniques like topping, FIMing, and SCROG work better with photoperiod plants that have time to recover during extended vegetative periods. Autoflowers’ rapid life cycle limits training options and eliminates cloning capability.
- Choose Based on Growing Goals and Constraints: Photoperiod cannabis suits growers seeking maximum yields, quality genetics, cloning capability, and advanced techniques, accepting the requirement for light schedule control. Autoflowering cannabis suits growers prioritizing speed, simplicity, stealth, or outdoor growing in short-season climates, accepting lower yields and inability to clone. Many experienced growers use both types strategically—photoperiod for main crops and autoflowers for quick harvests between photoperiod cycles.
Introduction: Understanding Flowering Triggers
Cannabis flowering—the reproductive phase when plants develop the resinous flowers (buds) that contain cannabinoids—is triggered by different mechanisms depending on plant genetics. Understanding these flowering triggers is fundamental to successful cannabis cultivation, as they determine light schedules, grow room design, timing, and available cultivation techniques.
Most cannabis plants are photoperiod, meaning they flower in response to changing photoperiod (day length). In nature, photoperiod cannabis grows vegetatively during long summer days and flowers when autumn brings shorter days and longer nights. This photoperiod sensitivity evolved as an adaptation to seasonal climates, ensuring plants flower and produce seeds before winter. Indoor growers replicate this seasonal change by manipulating light schedules—maintaining 18 hours of light for vegetative growth and switching to 12 hours of light to trigger flowering.
However, a third cannabis subspecies called Cannabis ruderalis evolved in the harsh climates of Russia and Central Asia, where short growing seasons and unpredictable weather made photoperiod dependence risky. Ruderalis adapted to flower automatically based on age rather than light schedule, ensuring reproduction before the brief summer ended. While ruderalis itself produces minimal cannabinoids and has little recreational or medical value, breeders have crossed ruderalis genetics with potent photoperiod strains to create autoflowering hybrids that combine automatic flowering with desirable potency and effects.
The distinction between photoperiod and autoflowering cannabis fundamentally shapes cultivation approach. Photoperiod growing requires separate vegetative and flowering spaces (or light schedule changes), strict darkness during flowering, and careful timing. In exchange, photoperiod offers maximum yield potential, cloning capability, and complete control over plant size. Autoflowering cultivation requires no light schedule changes, allows flexible scheduling, and provides rapid harvests. However, autoflowers sacrifice yield potential, cloning capability, and vegetative control.
Modern cannabis cultivation includes both types, with photoperiod strains dominating commercial production and serious hobbyist growing, while autoflowers serve niche roles including beginner growing, guerrilla cultivation, short-season outdoor growing, and quick harvests between photoperiod crops. Neither type is inherently superior—each excels in specific situations based on grower goals, constraints, and priorities.
This comprehensive guide examines photoperiod and autoflowering cannabis from both botanical and practical perspectives. We’ll explore the biological mechanisms controlling flowering, compare yields and quality, analyze advantages and disadvantages of each type, discuss light schedule strategies, and provide decision frameworks to help you choose the right approach for your specific situation.
For premium genetics in both photoperiod and autoflowering varieties, explore quality seeds at seedbanks.com and weed.de, featuring selections from Official Cannabis Seeds, Blue Dream, and Sour Diesel.
Understanding Photoperiod Cannabis
Photoperiod cannabis represents the traditional, naturally evolved form of Cannabis sativa and Cannabis indica. These plants use photoperiod (day length) as an environmental cue to determine when to transition from vegetative growth to flowering, ensuring reproduction occurs at the optimal time before winter.
How Photoperiod Flowering Works
Photoperiod cannabis flowering is controlled by phytochrome, a light-sensitive protein that exists in two forms: Pr (red light-absorbing) and Pfr (far-red light-absorbing). During daylight, red light converts Pr to Pfr. During darkness, Pfr slowly reverts to Pr. When Pfr levels drop below a critical threshold after sufficient darkness, the plant perceives it’s autumn and initiates flowering.
Critical Dark Period: Cannabis requires approximately twelve hours of uninterrupted darkness per twenty-four hour period to initiate and maintain flowering. This critical dark period must be completely dark—even brief light exposure during the dark period can disrupt flowering or cause plants to revert to vegetative growth (a problem called “re-vegging”).
Vegetative Light Schedule: During vegetative growth, photoperiod cannabis requires long days (short nights) to prevent premature flowering. Indoor growers typically use 18/6 (18 hours light, 6 hours dark) or 24/0 (continuous light) schedules. Outdoor plants naturally vegetate during spring and summer when days are longer than twelve hours.
Flowering Light Schedule: To trigger flowering indoors, growers switch to 12/12 (12 hours light, 12 hours dark) schedule. This mimics autumn day length and causes plants to begin flowering within one to two weeks. The 12/12 schedule must be maintained throughout flowering (typically 8-12 weeks) until harvest.
Outdoor Photoperiod: Outdoor photoperiod cannabis automatically flowers when natural day length drops below the critical threshold, typically in late summer or early autumn depending on latitude. Northern hemisphere plants usually begin flowering in August or September, finishing in October or November depending on strain and location.
Light Schedule Requirements
Photoperiod cannabis cultivation requires careful light schedule management:
Vegetative Stage (18/6 or 24/0):
- Maintains vegetative growth indefinitely
- Allows plant size control before flowering
- Enables mother plant maintenance for cloning
- Can be extended for weeks or months as desired
- Requires timer for consistent scheduling
Flowering Stage (12/12):
- Triggers and maintains flowering
- Requires complete darkness during dark period
- Light leaks can disrupt flowering or cause hermaphroditism
- Must be maintained for entire flowering period (8-12 weeks)
- Requires light-proof grow space
Light Leak Prevention: During flowering, even small amounts of light during the dark period can disrupt flowering. Growers must ensure grow spaces are completely light-proof, covering indicator lights on equipment, sealing door gaps, and preventing any light intrusion during the twelve-hour dark period.
Advantages of Photoperiod Cannabis
Maximum Yield Potential: Photoperiod cannabis produces significantly higher yields than autoflowers. The ability to extend vegetative growth allows plants to reach desired size before flowering, maximizing final yields. Indoor photoperiod plants typically yield 400-600 grams per square meter, while outdoor plants can produce 500-2000 grams per plant depending on size and conditions.
Complete Size Control: Growers control exactly when flowering begins by changing light schedule, allowing precise plant size management. Want small plants? Flower after two weeks vegetative growth. Want large plants? Vegetate for two months. This control allows optimization for specific grow spaces and yield goals.
Cloning Capability: Photoperiod plants can be cloned (propagated from cuttings), creating genetically identical copies of superior plants. Growers maintain mother plants in perpetual vegetative state, taking unlimited clones for consistent genetics, eliminating seed costs, and preserving exceptional phenotypes.
Mother Plant Maintenance: The ability to keep plants in vegetative state indefinitely allows maintaining mother plants that provide continuous clone supply. This ensures genetic consistency across multiple grows and preserves valuable genetics indefinitely.
Training Technique Compatibility: Photoperiod plants have time during extended vegetative periods to recover from training stress. Techniques like topping, FIMing, super cropping, and SCROG work excellently with photoperiod cannabis, as plants can recover and develop new growth before flowering begins.
Stress Recovery: If photoperiod plants experience stress, disease, or damage during vegetative growth, growers can extend the vegetative period to allow full recovery before flowering. This flexibility prevents compromised yields from early-stage problems.
Superior Genetics Selection: The vast majority of cannabis breeding has focused on photoperiod genetics. Photoperiod strains offer the widest selection of genetics, flavors, effects, and cannabinoid profiles. Most legendary strains (OG Kush, Sour Diesel, Girl Scout Cookies, etc.) are photoperiod.
Higher Potency Potential: While modern autoflowers have improved significantly, the most potent cannabis strains (testing above 30% THC) are typically photoperiod. The longer flowering times of photoperiod strains may allow more complete cannabinoid and terpene development.
Outdoor Flexibility: Outdoor photoperiod growers can manipulate flowering timing by using light deprivation (covering plants to create artificial darkness) or supplemental lighting (extending day length), allowing multiple harvests per season or flowering control in equatorial regions.
Disadvantages of Photoperiod Cannabis
Light Schedule Requirements: Photoperiod cultivation requires strict light schedule management with timers, separate vegetative and flowering spaces (or schedule changes), and complete darkness during flowering. This adds complexity and equipment requirements compared to autoflowers.
Light Leak Sensitivity: The requirement for complete darkness during flowering means grow spaces must be light-proof. Even small light leaks from indicator lights, door gaps, or nearby windows can disrupt flowering, cause hermaphroditism, or trigger re-vegging.
Longer Time to Harvest: Photoperiod cannabis requires separate vegetative and flowering periods, typically totaling 12-20 weeks from seed to harvest (4-8 weeks vegetative + 8-12 weeks flowering). This longer timeline delays harvests compared to autoflowers’ 8-12 week total cycle.
Separate Spaces Required: Optimal photoperiod cultivation requires separate spaces for vegetative growth (18/6) and flowering (12/12), doubling space and equipment requirements. Alternatively, growers must change light schedules in a single space, preventing continuous harvests.
Outdoor Season Limitations: Outdoor photoperiod cannabis is limited to one harvest per year in most climates, as plants must complete vegetative growth during spring/summer and flower during autumn. Short-season climates may not provide sufficient time for long-flowering sativa strains.
Complexity for Beginners: The requirement to manage light schedules, prevent light leaks, and time the vegetative-to-flowering transition adds complexity that can overwhelm beginning growers. Mistakes in light schedule management can severely impact yields.
Popular Photoperiod Strains
The vast majority of famous cannabis strains are photoperiod genetics:
OG Kush: Legendary indica-dominant strain with distinctive fuel-pine aroma and powerful relaxing effects. Flowers in 8-9 weeks with high yields and potency.
Sour Diesel: Iconic sativa-dominant strain with diesel-fuel aroma and energizing effects. Flowers in 10-11 weeks with excellent potency.
Girl Scout Cookies (GSC): Popular indica-dominant hybrid combining OG Kush and Durban Poison genetics. Sweet flavor, high potency, flowers in 9-10 weeks.
Blue Dream: Balanced hybrid of Blueberry and Haze, offering gentle relaxation with mental clarity. Flowers in 9-10 weeks with high yields.
Gorilla Glue #4 (GG4): Extremely potent hybrid known for heavy resin production and couch-lock effects. Flowers in 8-9 weeks.
Wedding Cake: Indica-dominant hybrid of Girl Scout Cookies and Cherry Pie, with vanilla flavor and balanced effects. Flowers in 8-9 weeks.
Understanding Autoflowering Cannabis
Autoflowering cannabis represents a relatively recent innovation in cannabis breeding, combining the automatic flowering trait of Cannabis ruderalis with the potency and desirable characteristics of photoperiod Cannabis sativa and Cannabis indica strains.
Cannabis Ruderalis Origins
Cannabis ruderalis is a third cannabis subspecies (alongside sativa and indica) that evolved in the harsh climates of Russia, Central Asia, and Eastern Europe. These regions experience short growing seasons with long summer days (20+ hours of daylight in far northern latitudes) and unpredictable weather.
In these conditions, photoperiod dependence would be disadvantageous—waiting for autumn’s shorter days might mean flowering begins too late to complete before winter. Ruderalis evolved to flower automatically based on age (typically 3-4 weeks after germination) regardless of photoperiod, ensuring reproduction within the brief summer growing season.
However, ruderalis produces minimal cannabinoids (typically 1-3% THC), has low yields, and offers little recreational or medical value. Its sole valuable trait is automatic flowering. Beginning in the 1970s and accelerating in the 2000s, breeders began crossing ruderalis with potent photoperiod strains to create autoflowering hybrids that maintain automatic flowering while dramatically improving potency, yields, and quality.
How Autoflowering Works
Autoflowering cannabis begins flowering based on age rather than light schedule. The mechanism involves genetic programming that triggers flowering after a certain number of days regardless of environmental conditions.
Age-Based Flowering: Autoflowers typically begin flowering 2-4 weeks after germination, transitioning automatically from seedling to vegetative to flowering stages without any light schedule change. This age-based trigger is genetically determined and cannot be prevented or delayed.
No Light Schedule Requirement: Because flowering is age-based rather than photoperiod-based, autoflowers can flower under any light schedule including 24/0, 20/4, 18/6, or even 12/12. Most growers use 18/6 or 20/4 throughout the entire life cycle for optimal growth while managing electricity costs.
Rapid Life Cycle: The complete life cycle from seed to harvest typically takes 8-12 weeks:
- Weeks 1-2: Seedling stage
- Weeks 2-4: Vegetative growth
- Weeks 4-10: Flowering
- Week 10-12: Final ripening and harvest
No Vegetative Control: The automatic flowering trigger means growers cannot extend vegetative growth to increase plant size. Autoflowers will flower at their genetically predetermined time regardless of size, growing conditions, or grower preferences.
Light Schedule Flexibility
Autoflowers’ independence from photoperiod provides significant flexibility:
Continuous Light Schedules: Autoflowers can be grown under 20/4 or even 24/0 light schedules throughout their entire life cycle, maximizing photosynthesis and potentially increasing yields. However, most growers use 18/6 or 20/4 as a compromise between growth and electricity costs.
No Light Leak Concerns: Because autoflowers don’t depend on darkness to flower, light leaks during dark periods don’t disrupt flowering. This eliminates the need for completely light-proof grow spaces and reduces stress about light contamination.
Mixed Light Schedules: Autoflowers can be grown alongside photoperiod plants in vegetative state (both under 18/6), allowing efficient space use. However, they cannot be grown alongside flowering photoperiod plants (12/12) without sacrificing autoflower yield potential.
Outdoor Flexibility: Outdoor autoflowers can be planted at any time during the growing season and will flower regardless of day length. This allows multiple harvests per season—plant in April, harvest in July; plant in July, harvest in September.
Supplemental Lighting Benefits: Outdoor autoflowers benefit from supplemental lighting to extend day length, as they flower regardless of photoperiod. Adding a few hours of light can increase yields without preventing flowering.
Advantages of Autoflowering Cannabis
Rapid Harvest Cycle: Autoflowers complete their entire life cycle in 8-12 weeks from seed to harvest, significantly faster than photoperiod cannabis (12-20 weeks). This rapid turnaround allows multiple harvests per year outdoors and quick results indoors.
Simplicity for Beginners: The lack of light schedule requirements, no need for light-proof spaces, and straightforward growing process makes autoflowers ideal for beginning growers. There’s no need to learn light schedule management or worry about light leaks.
No Separate Spaces Required: Autoflowers can complete their entire life cycle under a single light schedule (18/6 or 20/4), eliminating the need for separate vegetative and flowering spaces. This simplifies setup and reduces equipment costs.
Stealth and Discretion: The small size (typically 2-4 feet tall) and rapid life cycle of autoflowers suits stealth growing. Plants can be grown and harvested quickly with minimal space requirements.
Outdoor Short-Season Suitability: In northern climates with short growing seasons, autoflowers can complete their life cycle before autumn frost. They’re also ideal for guerrilla growing where quick harvests minimize detection risk.
Multiple Outdoor Harvests: Outdoor growers can achieve 2-3 autoflower harvests per season by planting successively. Plant in April (harvest July), plant in June (harvest August), plant in July (harvest September).
Light Leak Immunity: The lack of photoperiod dependence means light leaks don’t disrupt flowering. This eliminates a major source of growing problems and allows flexible grow space locations.
Continuous Indoor Harvests: By staggering autoflower planting dates, growers can achieve harvests every few weeks without maintaining separate vegetative and flowering spaces.
Ruderalis Hardiness: Autoflowers inherit some ruderalis hardiness, showing better cold tolerance and resilience to stress than some photoperiod strains. This makes them suitable for challenging outdoor conditions.
Disadvantages of Autoflowering Cannabis
Lower Yield Potential: Autoflowers typically yield 50-200 grams per plant, significantly less than photoperiod cannabis (100-300+ grams per plant indoors, 500-2000 grams outdoors). The brief vegetative period limits plant size and final yield potential.
No Cloning Capability: Autoflowers cannot be effectively cloned because clones inherit the age of the mother plant. A clone taken from a 3-week-old autoflower will begin flowering immediately, producing a tiny plant with minimal yield. This eliminates a major cultivation technique and requires purchasing seeds for each grow.
No Mother Plants: The inability to maintain autoflowers in perpetual vegetative state means no mother plants for continuous clone supply. Growers must purchase seeds for each grow, increasing long-term costs.
Limited Training Options: The rapid life cycle leaves little time for plants to recover from training stress. Aggressive techniques like topping or FIMing can reduce yields by delaying growth during the brief vegetative period. Only low-stress training (LST) is generally recommended for autoflowers.
No Stress Recovery Time: If autoflowers experience stress, disease, or damage, there’s no time to extend vegetative growth for recovery. Problems during the brief vegetative period directly impact final yields with no opportunity for correction.
No Size Control: Growers cannot control final plant size by adjusting vegetative duration. Autoflowers will reach their genetically predetermined size regardless of growing conditions or grower preferences.
Lower Potency (Historically): While modern autoflowers have improved dramatically, they historically produced lower THC levels than photoperiod strains due to ruderalis genetics. Current autoflowers can reach 20-25% THC, but the most potent strains (30%+) remain photoperiod.
Limited Genetic Selection: While autoflower selection has expanded significantly, photoperiod strains still offer far more genetic diversity, flavors, and effects. Many legendary strains are not available in autoflowering versions.
Seed Costs: The inability to clone means purchasing seeds for each grow. At $5-15 per seed, costs accumulate over multiple grows compared to photoperiod cloning which provides free plants after initial seed purchase.
Popular Autoflowering Strains
Modern autoflower breeding has produced impressive strains:
Northern Lights Auto: Autoflowering version of the legendary indica, offering relaxing effects and easy growing. Finishes in 8-9 weeks with 15-20% THC.
Gorilla Glue Auto: Autoflowering version of GG4, maintaining high potency (20-25% THC) and heavy resin production. Finishes in 8-10 weeks.
Girl Scout Cookies Auto: Autoflowering GSC with sweet flavor and balanced effects. Finishes in 9-10 weeks with 18-22% THC.
Amnesia Haze Auto: Sativa-dominant autoflower with energizing effects and citrus flavor. Finishes in 10-11 weeks with 18-22% THC.
Blue Dream Auto: Autoflowering version of the popular hybrid, offering balanced effects. Finishes in 9-10 weeks with 17-21% THC.
Zkittlez Auto: Fruity autoflower with candy-like flavor and relaxing effects. Finishes in 8-9 weeks with 18-23% THC.
Side-by-Side Comparison Table

Comprehensive comparison of Autoflowering vs Photoperiod cannabis across all key factors
| Aspect | Photoperiod | Autoflowering |
| Flowering Trigger | Light schedule (12/12) | Age (2-4 weeks) |
| Vegetative Light Schedule | 18/6 or 24/0 | Any (typically 18/6 or 20/4) |
| Flowering Light Schedule | 12/12 required | Any (typically 18/6 or 20/4) |
| Total Time (Seed to Harvest) | 12-20 weeks | 8-12 weeks |
| Vegetative Duration | Controllable (2-12+ weeks) | Fixed (2-4 weeks) |
| Flowering Duration | 8-12 weeks | 6-8 weeks |
| Plant Height | Controllable (2-10+ feet) | Fixed (2-4 feet) |
| Yield Per Plant (Indoor) | 100-300+ grams | 50-200 grams |
| Yield Per Plant (Outdoor) | 500-2000 grams | 100-300 grams |
| Yield Per Square Meter | 400-600 grams | 200-400 grams |
| THC Potential | 15-35%+ | 15-25% |
| Cloning Capability | Yes (unlimited) | No (ineffective) |
| Mother Plants | Yes (indefinite) | No |
| Training Compatibility | Excellent (all techniques) | Limited (LST only) |
| Light Leak Sensitivity | High (disrupts flowering) | None (immune) |
| Separate Spaces Required | Yes (veg + flower) or schedule change | No (single schedule) |
| Growing Difficulty | Moderate (light management) | Easy (straightforward) |
| Outdoor Harvests Per Year | 1 (season-dependent) | 2-3 (any time) |
| Stress Recovery | Excellent (extend veg) | Poor (no time) |
| Size Control | Complete (veg duration) | None (genetics only) |
| Genetic Selection | Extensive (thousands) | Moderate (hundreds) |
| Seed Cost Impact | Low (cloning available) | High (seeds each grow) |
| Best For | Maximum yields, quality, cloning, advanced techniques | Speed, simplicity, stealth, short seasons |
Yield Comparison
Yield represents one of the most significant differences between photoperiod and autoflowering cannabis, with photoperiod plants producing substantially more per plant when given adequate vegetative time.
Indoor Yield Comparison
Photoperiod Indoor Yields:
- Per plant: 100-300+ grams depending on vegetative time and training
- Per square meter: 400-600 grams (standard), 600-800 grams (optimized)
- Factors: Vegetative duration, training techniques, strain genetics, growing skill
- Timeline: 12-20 weeks total (4-8 weeks veg + 8-12 weeks flower)
Autoflower Indoor Yields:
- Per plant: 50-200 grams depending on genetics and conditions
- Per square meter: 200-400 grams
- Factors: Genetics, light schedule (20/4 vs 18/6), growing conditions
- Timeline: 8-12 weeks total from seed to harvest
Yield Per Week Analysis: When accounting for time differences, the yield advantage narrows:
- Photoperiod: 400g per m² ÷ 16 weeks = 25g per m² per week
- Autoflower: 300g per m² ÷ 10 weeks = 30g per m² per week
This analysis suggests that autoflowers can produce similar or even superior yields per unit time when multiple harvests are considered. However, this requires continuous planting and harvesting, while photoperiod allows larger single harvests.
Outdoor Yield Comparison
Photoperiod Outdoor Yields:
- Per plant: 500-2000 grams depending on size, strain, and conditions
- Factors: Vegetative growth duration, plant size, climate, strain genetics
- Timeline: One harvest per year (spring planting, autumn harvest)
- Advantages: Massive plants with months of vegetative growth
Autoflower Outdoor Yields:
- Per plant: 100-300 grams depending on genetics and conditions
- Factors: Genetics, planting time, supplemental lighting
- Timeline: 2-3 harvests per season possible
- Advantages: Quick turnaround, multiple harvests, short-season suitability
Outdoor Season Total:
- Photoperiod: 500-2000g × 1 harvest = 500-2000g per season
- Autoflower: 150g × 3 harvests = 450g per season
For outdoor cultivation, photoperiod plants generally produce more total yield per season despite autoflowers allowing multiple harvests.
Factors Affecting Yield Comparison
Vegetative Time: Photoperiod’s controllable vegetative duration is the primary yield advantage. Longer vegetative periods produce larger plants with more flowering sites, dramatically increasing yields.
Plant Training: Photoperiod plants have time to recover from training stress during extended vegetative periods. Techniques like SCROG, topping, and super cropping significantly increase photoperiod yields but can reduce autoflower yields due to recovery time.
Growing Skill: Experienced growers maximize photoperiod yields through training and vegetative optimization. Autoflowers offer less opportunity for skill to impact yields, as the brief vegetative period limits intervention.
Genetics: Modern autoflower breeding has significantly improved yields, with some strains producing 150-200 grams per plant. However, photoperiod genetics still offer higher maximum yield potential.
Yield Recommendations
Choose Photoperiod for Maximum Yields: If yield is your primary goal and you have time and space for proper cultivation, photoperiod cannabis produces significantly more per plant and per square meter.
Choose Autoflowers for Yield Per Time: If you want continuous harvests and measure success in yield per week rather than yield per harvest, autoflowers can be competitive through multiple rapid cycles.
Consider Hybrid Approaches: Some growers use photoperiod for main crops (maximum yields) and autoflowers for quick harvests between photoperiod cycles, optimizing both total yield and harvest frequency.
Potency and Quality
Potency (cannabinoid content, particularly THC) and overall quality (terpene profiles, effects, bag appeal) represent important considerations when choosing between photoperiod and autoflowering cannabis.
THC Potency Comparison
Photoperiod Potency:
- Range: 15-35%+ THC
- Top strains: 28-35% THC achievable
- Factors: Genetics, growing conditions, harvest timing
- Advantages: Decades of breeding focused on potency
Autoflower Potency:
- Range: 15-25% THC
- Top strains: 22-25% THC achievable
- Factors: Genetics, ruderalis dilution, growing conditions
- Improvements: Modern autoflowers significantly more potent than early versions
Historical Context: Early autoflowers (2000s-early 2010s) produced only 8-12% THC due to high ruderalis content. Modern breeding has dramatically improved autoflower potency through multiple backcrosses to potent photoperiod genetics, reducing ruderalis content while maintaining automatic flowering.
Current Reality: While the potency gap has narrowed significantly, the most potent cannabis strains remain photoperiod. Strains testing above 30% THC are almost exclusively photoperiod genetics. However, modern autoflowers at 20-25% THC are sufficiently potent for most users.
Terpene Profiles and Quality
Photoperiod Terpenes:
- Complex, well-developed terpene profiles
- Longer flowering times may allow more complete terpene development
- Wider selection of flavor profiles and effects
- Decades of breeding focused on terpene diversity
Autoflower Terpenes:
- Improving but historically less complex than photoperiod
- Shorter flowering times may limit terpene development
- Modern autoflowers approaching photoperiod terpene quality
- Selection expanding but still more limited than photoperiod
Quality Factors: Beyond potency and terpenes, quality includes bud structure, resin production, bag appeal, and effects. Photoperiod cannabis generally produces denser buds with better bag appeal, while autoflowers sometimes produce airier buds with less impressive visual appearance.
Medical Applications
For medical cannabis patients, potency and cannabinoid profiles are critical:
High-THC Requirements: Patients requiring high THC content (25%+) for severe pain, nausea, or other conditions should choose photoperiod strains, as they offer the highest THC potential.
CBD-Rich Strains: Both photoperiod and autoflowering CBD-rich strains are available. For medical CBD use, either type works well, though photoperiod offers wider selection.
Terpene-Specific Needs: Patients seeking specific terpene profiles for therapeutic effects (limonene for mood, myrcene for sedation, etc.) will find more options in photoperiod genetics.
Consistency: Photoperiod cloning allows medical patients to maintain genetically identical plants with consistent cannabinoid and terpene profiles. Autoflowers require purchasing seeds each grow, which may show phenotype variation even within the same strain.
Quality Recommendations
Choose Photoperiod for Maximum Potency: If you require the highest possible THC content (28%+) or most complex terpene profiles, photoperiod genetics offer superior options.
Autoflowers Sufficient for Most Users: For recreational users and medical patients not requiring extreme potency, modern autoflowers at 20-25% THC provide adequate effects.
Photoperiod for Genetic Consistency: Medical patients and growers seeking consistent cannabinoid profiles should choose photoperiod strains that can be cloned for genetic uniformity.
Consider Specific Needs: Evaluate your actual potency requirements. Many users overestimate needed THC levels—20% THC autoflowers satisfy most consumers despite not matching 30%+ photoperiod strains.
Growing Difficulty and Learning Curve
The complexity of cultivation differs significantly between photoperiod and autoflowering cannabis, affecting suitability for growers of different experience levels.
Photoperiod Growing Difficulty
Skill Level: Moderate to Advanced
Key Challenges:
- Light schedule management requiring timers and consistency
- Light-proofing grow spaces to prevent flowering disruption
- Timing vegetative-to-flowering transition for optimal plant size
- Managing separate vegetative and flowering spaces (or schedule changes)
- Preventing light leaks during flowering
- Understanding and implementing training techniques
Learning Curve: Photoperiod cultivation requires understanding light schedules, photoperiod sensitivity, and timing. Beginners often make mistakes including:
- Light leaks during flowering causing hermaphroditism or re-vegging
- Flowering too early (small plants, low yields)
- Flowering too late (plants too large for space)
- Inconsistent light schedules disrupting flowering
Time to Proficiency: Most growers achieve competence with photoperiod cultivation after 2-3 complete grows, learning light management, timing, and training techniques through experience.
Advantages for Learning: Photoperiod cannabis is forgiving in some ways—if problems occur during vegetative growth, growers can extend the vegetative period to allow recovery before flowering. This provides time to correct mistakes without compromising yields.
Autoflower Growing Difficulty
Skill Level: Beginner to Moderate
Key Advantages:
- No light schedule changes required
- No light-proofing necessary
- No timing decisions for flowering
- Single space sufficient for entire life cycle
- Straightforward growing process
Challenges:
- No stress recovery time (mistakes directly impact yields)
- Limited training options (aggressive techniques reduce yields)
- No size control (genetics determine final size)
- Rapid life cycle requires timely responses to problems
Learning Curve: Autoflower cultivation is significantly simpler than photoperiod, making it ideal for beginners. The lack of light schedule requirements eliminates a major source of growing problems and complexity.
Time to Proficiency: Most growers achieve competence with autoflower cultivation after 1-2 grows, as the straightforward process has fewer variables to master.
Disadvantages for Learning: Autoflowers are less forgiving of mistakes because there’s no time to extend vegetative growth for recovery. Problems during the brief vegetative period directly impact final yields with no opportunity for correction.
Specific Growing Challenges
Light Management:
- Photoperiod: Requires strict 12/12 schedule during flowering, complete darkness, light leak prevention
- Autoflower: Flexible schedule (18/6, 20/4, or 24/0), no darkness requirement, light leak immunity
Training Techniques:
- Photoperiod: Supports all training techniques (topping, FIMing, super cropping, SCROG, SOG), time for recovery
- Autoflower: Limited to low-stress training (LST), no time for recovery from aggressive techniques
Problem Solving:
- Photoperiod: Can extend vegetative period to recover from stress, disease, or mistakes
- Autoflower: No recovery time, problems directly impact yields
Space Management:
- Photoperiod: Requires separate veg/flower spaces or schedule changes, more complex setup
- Autoflower: Single space sufficient, simpler setup
Recommendations by Experience Level
Complete Beginners: Start with autoflowers to learn basic cannabis cultivation without light schedule complexity. The straightforward process builds confidence and provides quick results.
Intermediate Growers: Transition to photoperiod cannabis to learn light management, training techniques, and advanced cultivation methods. The additional complexity provides more opportunity for optimization.
Advanced Growers: Use both types strategically—photoperiod for main crops with maximum yields and quality, autoflowers for quick harvests between photoperiod cycles or specific applications.
Medical Patients: Consider starting with autoflowers for simplicity, then transition to photoperiod cloning for consistent genetics and cannabinoid profiles.
Cost Analysis
The financial implications of choosing photoperiod versus autoflowering cannabis extend beyond initial seed costs to include equipment, electricity, and long-term expenses.
Initial Setup Costs
Photoperiod Setup:
- Grow tent/space: $100-500
- Lighting (veg + flower): $200-800 (separate spaces) or $100-400 (single space with schedule change)
- Timers: $20-50 (critical for schedule management)
- Ventilation: $100-300
- Light-proofing materials: $20-100
- Growing medium and nutrients: $50-200
- Seeds: $30-100 (10 seeds)
- Total: $520-2,050
Autoflower Setup:
- Grow tent/space: $100-500
- Lighting (single schedule): $100-400
- Timer: $10-20 (less critical)
- Ventilation: $100-300
- Growing medium and nutrients: $50-200
- Seeds: $50-150 (10 seeds, typically more expensive)
- Total: $410-1,570
Cost Difference: Autoflower setups cost $110-480 less initially due to simpler lighting requirements and no need for light-proofing or separate spaces.
Ongoing Costs
Electricity Costs (Per Grow):
Photoperiod (16-week grow):
- Vegetative (4 weeks, 18/6, 400W): 134 kWh
- Flowering (12 weeks, 12/12, 400W): 201 kWh
- Total: 335 kWh × $0.12/kWh = $40 per grow
- Autoflower (10-week grow, 20/4, 400W):
- Total: 267 kWh × $0.12/kWh = $32 per grow
Cost Per Year (4 Grows):
- Photoperiod: $40 × 3 grows = $120/year
- Autoflower: $32 × 4 grows = $128/year
Electricity costs are similar annually, with autoflowers slightly higher due to longer daily light periods despite shorter total cycle time.
Seed Costs:
Photoperiod:
- Initial seeds: $30-100 (10 seeds)
- Cloning: $0 (unlimited free plants after initial purchase)
- Long-term: $0 (maintain mother plants and clone indefinitely)
Autoflower:
- Seeds per grow: $50-150 (10 seeds)
- Cloning: Not possible
- Long-term: $200-600/year (4 grows × $50-150)
Long-Term Cost Comparison (5 Years):
Photoperiod:
- Initial setup: $520-2,050
- Electricity (5 years): $600
- Seeds (one-time): $30-100
- Nutrients and supplies: $500
- Total: $1,650-3,250
Autoflower:
- Initial setup: $410-1,570
- Electricity (5 years): $640
- Seeds (ongoing): $1,000-3,000
- Nutrients and supplies: $500
- Total: $2,550-5,710
Five-Year Savings with Photoperiod: $900-2,460
The inability to clone autoflowers results in significant long-term costs from purchasing seeds for each grow. Photoperiod cloning provides substantial savings over time.
Yield Value
When considering cost-effectiveness, yield value matters:
Photoperiod:
- Yield per grow: 400g per m²
- Grows per year: 3
- Annual yield: 1,200g
- Cost per gram: $1.38-2.71 (5-year average)
Autoflower:
- Yield per grow: 300g per m²
- Grows per year: 4
- Annual yield: 1,200g
- Cost per gram: $2.13-4.76 (5-year average)
Despite similar annual yields, photoperiod cannabis costs significantly less per gram due to cloning savings.
Cost Recommendations
Choose Photoperiod for Long-Term Savings: If you plan to grow continuously for years, photoperiod cloning provides substantial cost savings despite higher initial complexity.
Choose Autoflowers for Low Initial Investment: If upfront costs are a concern or you’re unsure about long-term growing commitment, autoflowers require less initial investment.
Consider Hybrid Approach: Maintain photoperiod mother plants for cloning while using autoflowers for quick harvests, combining cost savings with scheduling flexibility.
Factor in Your Time Value: While photoperiod saves money, it requires more time for light management and training. If your time is valuable, autoflower simplicity may justify higher seed costs.
Light Schedule Strategies
Optimizing light schedules for each cannabis type maximizes yields, quality, and efficiency while managing electricity costs.
Photoperiod Light Schedules
Vegetative Stage Options:
- 18/6 (18 hours light, 6 hours dark):
- Most common vegetative schedule
- Balances growth with electricity costs and equipment lifespan
- Provides dark period for plant respiration and root development
- Recommended for most growers
24/0 (Continuous light):
- Maximum photosynthesis and fastest vegetative growth
- Higher electricity costs
- No dark period for plant rest (debated whether this matters)
- May reduce equipment lifespan due to continuous operation
- Some growers report slightly faster growth; others see no difference
20/4 or 22/2:
- Compromise between 18/6 and 24/0
- Slightly faster growth than 18/6 with modest electricity increase
- Brief dark period for plant processes
Flowering Stage:
12/12 (12 hours light, 12 hours dark):
- Standard flowering schedule for cannabis
- Mimics autumn day length
- Requires strict adherence and complete darkness during dark period
- Used for entire flowering period (8-12 weeks)
11/13 or 10/14 (Extended darkness):
- Some growers use extended darkness late in flowering to stress plants and potentially increase resin production
- May slightly accelerate flowering
- Risk of reduced yields from less light
- Controversial; not universally recommended
Autoflower Light Schedules
20/4 (20 hours light, 4 hours dark):
- Most popular autoflower schedule
- Balances maximum light with electricity costs and equipment rest
- Provides brief dark period for plant processes
- Recommended for most growers seeking maximum yields
18/6:
- More economical than 20/4
- Slightly lower yields than 20/4 (typically 10-15% less)
- Extends equipment lifespan
- Good choice for budget-conscious growers
24/0 (Continuous light):
- Maximum photosynthesis potential
- Highest electricity costs
- Debated whether continuous light benefits or stresses plants
- Some growers report best yields; others see no advantage over 20/4
12/12:
- Autoflowers can flower under 12/12 (same as photoperiod flowering)
- Results in lower yields due to reduced light
- Only use if growing autoflowers alongside flowering photoperiod plants
- Not recommended for dedicated autoflower grows
Light Schedule Recommendations
Photoperiod Vegetative: Use 18/6 for balanced growth and costs. Consider 20/4 or 24/0 only if electricity costs are low and you want maximum growth speed.
Photoperiod Flowering: Use 12/12 exclusively. Maintain strict schedule with complete darkness during dark period. Invest in quality timer and backup timer for reliability.
Autoflower Standard: Use 20/4 for maximum yields. This provides excellent growth while managing electricity costs and equipment lifespan.
Autoflower Budget: Use 18/6 if electricity costs are high or you want to extend equipment lifespan. Accept 10-15% yield reduction as trade-off for cost savings.
Mixed Growing: If growing autoflowers alongside vegetative photoperiod plants, use 18/6 schedule that works for both. Never grow autoflowers with flowering photoperiod plants under 12/12.
Choosing Between Photoperiod and Autoflowering
The choice between photoperiod and autoflowering cannabis depends on your specific growing situation, goals, constraints, and priorities.
Decision Framework
What is your experience level?
Complete Beginner:
Choose Autoflowering: Simplicity and lack of light schedule requirements make autoflowers ideal for first-time growers. Quick results build confidence.
Some Experience:
Either Works: If you’ve successfully grown autoflowers and want to expand skills, transition to photoperiod. If you prefer simplicity, continue with autoflowers.
Experienced Grower:
Choose Photoperiod: Maximum yields, cloning capability, and advanced techniques make photoperiod the choice for experienced growers seeking optimization.
What are your space constraints?
Small Space (2×2 to 3×3 tent):
Either Works: Autoflowers suit small spaces due to compact size. Photoperiod works if you can manage height through training and early flowering.
Medium Space (4×4 to 5×5):
Either Works: Both types work well. Choose based on other priorities.
Large Space (8×8+ or outdoor):
Choose Photoperiod: Large spaces allow photoperiod plants to reach full size potential, maximizing yields.
Do you need separate veg/flower spaces?
Single Space Only:
Choose Autoflowering: Single light schedule throughout life cycle eliminates need for separate spaces.
Can Manage Separate Spaces:
Choose Photoperiod: Separate spaces allow continuous harvests with perpetual photoperiod growing.
What is your primary goal?
Maximum Yields:
Choose Photoperiod: Significantly higher yields per plant and per square meter.
Speed and Quick Results:
Choose Autoflowering: 8-12 week total cycle provides rapid harvests.
Simplicity and Ease:
Choose Autoflowering: Straightforward growing process without light schedule complexity.
Cloning and Genetic Consistency:
Choose Photoperiod: Cloning capability and mother plant maintenance provide consistent genetics.
What is your growing environment?
Indoor Year-Round:
Either Works: Choose based on other priorities.
Outdoor Short Season:
Choose Autoflowering: Complete life cycle before frost in northern climates.
Outdoor Long Season:
Choose Photoperiod: Maximize yields with months of vegetative growth.
Guerrilla/Stealth Growing:
Choose Autoflowering: Quick harvests minimize detection risk.
What is your budget?
Limited Budget:
Choose Autoflowering: Lower initial setup costs, though higher long-term seed costs.
Long-Term Growing:
Choose Photoperiod: Cloning provides substantial long-term savings despite higher initial investment.
Do you want to learn advanced techniques?
Yes:
Choose Photoperiod: Supports all training techniques, cloning, mother plants, and advanced cultivation methods.
No:
Choose Autoflowering: Straightforward growing without need for advanced techniques.
Recommendations by Situation
Beginner Indoor Grower: Start with autoflowers to learn basics, then transition to photoperiod after 2-3 successful grows to expand skills and reduce long-term costs.
Experienced Indoor Grower: Use photoperiod for main crops with cloning for genetic consistency and maximum yields. Consider autoflowers for quick harvests between photoperiod cycles.
Outdoor Short-Season Grower: Choose autoflowers that complete before frost, or use early-finishing photoperiod indica strains.
Outdoor Long-Season Grower: Choose photoperiod for maximum yields, or use multiple autoflower plantings for continuous harvests.
Medical Patient: Start with autoflowers for simplicity, then transition to photoperiod cloning for consistent cannabinoid profiles and cost savings.
Commercial Grower: Use photoperiod for maximum yields and quality. Autoflowers rarely make economic sense for commercial cultivation due to lower yields.
Guerrilla Grower: Choose autoflowers for quick harvests and stealth, minimizing detection risk.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can autoflowers be cloned?
Technically yes, but practically no. Autoflower clones inherit the age of the mother plant, so a clone taken from a 3-week-old autoflower will begin flowering immediately upon rooting. This produces a tiny plant with minimal yield (typically 5-15 grams), making autoflower cloning impractical. The inability to clone is one of autoflowers’ major disadvantages, requiring seed purchases for each grow.
Can I keep autoflowers in vegetative state longer?
No. Autoflowers begin flowering based on age (typically 2-4 weeks after germination) regardless of light schedule or growing conditions. There is no way to extend vegetative growth or prevent flowering. This age-based trigger is genetically programmed and cannot be overridden. This lack of vegetative control is a fundamental limitation of autoflowering cannabis.
What happens if I grow autoflowers under 12/12 light?
Autoflowers will flower under any light schedule including 12/12, as they don’t depend on photoperiod. However, 12/12 provides less light than optimal schedules (18/6 or 20/4), resulting in lower yields—typically 30-50% less than the same strain under 20/4. Only use 12/12 for autoflowers if growing them alongside flowering photoperiod plants where 12/12 is required.
Can photoperiod plants flower outdoors before autumn?
Yes, through light deprivation. Outdoor growers can cover plants with light-proof material to create artificial darkness, forcing flowering before natural day length triggers it. This technique allows multiple photoperiod harvests per season or earlier harvests to avoid autumn weather. However, it requires daily covering and uncovering, making it labor-intensive.
Are autoflowers less potent than photoperiod strains?
Modern autoflowers are significantly more potent than early versions, with top strains reaching 22-25% THC. However, the most potent cannabis strains (30%+ THC) remain photoperiod genetics. For most users, 20-25% THC autoflowers provide adequate potency. Medical patients requiring extreme potency (28%+) should choose photoperiod strains.
Can I switch photoperiod plants back to vegetative growth after flowering?
Yes, through “re-vegging.” If you return flowering photoperiod plants to 18/6 or 24/0 light schedule, they will eventually revert to vegetative growth after 2-4 weeks. This technique is used to preserve genetics from flowering plants or recover from accidental flowering. However, re-vegging is stressful and produces unusual growth initially.
Why do some growers use 24/0 light for vegetative growth?
Some growers believe continuous light (24/0) produces faster vegetative growth than 18/6 by maximizing photosynthesis. However, this is debated—many growers see no difference, and some argue plants benefit from dark periods for respiration and root development. The 24/0 schedule increases electricity costs and equipment wear without proven benefits. Most growers use 18/6 as a balanced approach.
Can I top or FIM autoflowers?
You can, but it’s generally not recommended. Topping and FIMing stress plants and require recovery time. Autoflowers’ brief vegetative period (2-4 weeks) means recovery time directly reduces final size and yields. Most autoflower growers use only low-stress training (LST) which doesn’t require recovery. If you do top autoflowers, do it very early (around day 14) to allow maximum recovery time.
Do autoflowers need nutrients during the dark period?
This question reflects confusion about autoflower growing. Autoflowers don’t require dark periods—they can be grown under continuous light (24/0) if desired. Nutrient feeding schedules are unrelated to light schedules. Feed autoflowers according to their growth stage (seedling, vegetative, flowering) regardless of light schedule, typically starting with mild nutrients around week 2-3.
Can I grow photoperiod and autoflower plants together?
Yes, but with limitations. Photoperiod and autoflower plants can share space during photoperiod vegetative stage (both under 18/6). However, when photoperiod plants switch to flowering (12/12), autoflowers will suffer reduced yields from less light. Best practice is growing them together under 18/6 or 20/4, harvesting autoflowers as they finish while photoperiod plants continue vegetating, then moving photoperiod plants to separate flowering space.
References
1.Petit, J., Salentijn, E. M. J., Paulo, M. J., Thouminot, C., van Dinter, B. J., Magagnini, G., … & Trindade, L. M. (2020). Genetic variability of morphological, flowering, and biomass quality traits in hemp (Cannabis sativa L.). Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, 102. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00102
2.Salentijn, E. M., Zhang, Q., Amaducci, S., Yang, M., & Trindade, L. M. (2015). New developments in fiber hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) breeding. Industrial Crops and Products, 68, 32-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.08.011
3.Amaducci, S., Scordia, D., Liu, F. H., Zhang, Q., Guo, H., Testa, G., & Cosentino, S. L. (2015). Key cultivation techniques for hemp in Europe and China. Industrial Crops and Products, 68, 2-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.06.041
4.Faux, A. M., Draye, X., Lambert, R., d’Andrimont, R., Raulier, P., & Bertin, P. (2013). The relationship of stem and seed yields to flowering phenology and sex expression in monoecious hemp (Cannabis sativa L.). European Journal of Agronomy, 47, 11-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2013.01.006
5.Toth, J. A., Stack, G. M., Cala, A. R., Carlson, C. H., Wilk, R. L., Crawford, J. L., … & Philippe, G. (2020). Development and validation of genetic markers for sex and cannabinoid chemotype in Cannabis sativa L. GCB Bioenergy, 12(3), 213-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12667
6.Stack, G. M., Toth, J. A., Carlson, C. H., Cala, A. R., Marrero-González, M. I., Wilk, R. L., … & Smart, L. B. (2021). Season-long characterization of high-cannabinoid hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) reveals variation in cannabinoid accumulation, flowering time, and disease resistance. GCB Bioenergy, 13(4), 546-561. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12793
7.Danziger, N., & Bernstein, N. (2021). Plant architecture manipulation increases cannabinoid standardization in ‘drug-type’ medical cannabis. Industrial Crops and Products, 167, 113528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.113528
8.Caplan, D., Dixon, M., & Zheng, Y. (2017). Optimal rate of organic fertilizer during the vegetative-stage for cannabis grown in two coir-based substrates. HortScience, 52(9), 1307-1312. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI11903-17
9.Westmoreland, F. M., Kusuma, P., & Bugbee, B. (2021). Cannabis lighting: Decreasing blue photon fraction increases yield but efficacy is more important for cost effective production of cannabinoids. PLoS ONE, 16(3), e0248988. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248988
10.Rodriguez-Morrison, V., Llewellyn, D., & Zheng, Y. (2021). Cannabis yield, potency, and leaf photosynthesis respond differently to increasing light levels in an indoor environment. Frontiers in Plant Science, 12, 646020. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.646020
11.Hawley, D., Graham, T., Stasiak, M., & Dixon, M. (2018). Improving cannabis bud quality and yield with subcanopy lighting. HortScience, 53(11), 1593-1599. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI13173-18
12.Chandra, S., Lata, H., Khan, I. A., & ElSohly, M. A. (2017). Light dependence of photosynthesis and water vapor exchange characteristics in different high Δ9-THC yielding varieties of Cannabis sativa L. Journal of Applied Research on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, 7, 39-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmap.2017.05.004
13.Caplan, D., Dixon, M., & Zheng, Y. (2019). Increasing inflorescence dry weight and cannabinoid content in medical cannabis using controlled drought stress. HortScience, 54(5), 964-969. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI13510-18